Article tags (Meta, no ontology)
From Compile Worlds
(Created page with 'Kumizone has a '''quality scale''' used to determine the quality of its content pages. This scale is a 6-point scale, containing the grades ''Crap'', ''Cleanup'', ''Short'', ...') |
(→Fact) |
||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
<br clear="all" /> | <br clear="all" /> | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Wrong == | ||
+ | <div style='width: 50%; float: left; margin-right: 7px;'>{{Wrong}}</div> | ||
+ | An article is ''just plain wrong'' if, in an attempt to satisfy {{<nowiki>fact</nowiki>}}, [[obvious]]ly [[false]] information was added. Articles should go beyond facts and official sources in parody, but should not [[contradict]] either the above or existing [[extrapolation]]s. | ||
+ | |||
+ | <br clear="all" /> | ||
+ | |||
== Good == | == Good == | ||
An article is ''good'' if it meets no other criteria on this page. Good articles do not have immediate edit needs, but should still be expanded and improved where possible. | An article is ''good'' if it meets no other criteria on this page. Good articles do not have immediate edit needs, but should still be expanded and improved where possible. |
Revision as of 02:06, 3 April 2009
Kumizone has a quality scale used to determine the quality of its content pages. This scale is a 6-point scale, containing the grades Crap, Cleanup, Short, Fact, Good and Awesome as described below.
Crap
An article is crap if the information discussed by the article makes no sense whatsoever to even an experienced Kumizonian. Crap pages need to be totally rewritten or even deleted, as they, by definition, have no useful content.
Cleanup
An article requires cleanup if it has useful information, but the writing style or formatting of the article is bad.
Short
An article is short if it has some useful information and is written in a good style, but contains less than two paragraphs, or less than three paragraphs of sparse information. A page can also become short when Candleja--
Fact
This page has too large a proportion of factual information.
Improve this article by: removing this obsolete template
An article is too factual if none or almost none of it is based on opinion, sarcasm and so on. Articles with this tag probably belong over on Wikipedia. The entire point of this wiki is to be funny, so entirely truthful articles, while useful, are not within its scope.
Wrong
This page contains information which is just plain wrong.
Improve this article by: removing this obsolete template
An article is just plain wrong if, in an attempt to satisfy {{fact}}, obviously false information was added. Articles should go beyond facts and official sources in parody, but should not contradict either the above or existing extrapolations.
Good
An article is good if it meets no other criteria on this page. Good articles do not have immediate edit needs, but should still be expanded and improved where possible.
Awesome
An article is awesome if:
- The article does not meet any of the four negative grades.
- Nothing else could, at the present time, be added to or removed from the article that would make it directly or indirectly more useful.
- The page contains at least four sections (and therefore an automatic table of contents).
If an article satisfies the first and second of the above criteria but not the third criteria, it is a trivial article and should be deleted or merged into/with other articles.